From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 22:54:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE54106564A for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 22:54:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout027.mac.com (asmtpout027.mac.com [17.148.16.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C87028FC19 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 22:54:53 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from cswiger1.apple.com (unknown [17.209.4.71]) by asmtp027.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPSA id <0LXJ00FBHZMMVA50@asmtp027.mac.com> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 14:54:22 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.5.7110,1.0.211,0.0.0000 definitions=2012-01-09_06:2012-01-09, 2012-01-09, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1201090237 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 14:54:21 -0800 Message-id: <4ED84623-A290-4F78-9FE9-02AF93324D2C@mac.com> References: <4F0446B7.4090703@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120104142757.1c77c347@ernst.jennejohn.org> <4F04E648.9090206@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120105121825.656677e4@ernst.jennejohn.org> <20120106221610.00005fbe@unknown> <20120108160316.00003d59@unknown> <4F0A8164.9090502@herveybayaustralia.com.au> To: Paul Schmehl X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org ML" Subject: Re: linux-f10-nss_ldap: my first port - be gentle :) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 22:54:54 -0000 On Jan 9, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: > My brief search was unsuccessful as well. Is it really possible that the LInux community has abandoned providing checksums for RPM packages? If so, that boggles the mind. Surely they don't believe their repositories are unassailable? rpm -Va (or "rpm --verify --all") ought to consult an MD5 checksum to identify changes for all installed packages... Regards, -- -Chuck