From owner-freebsd-jobs Wed Mar 13 16:42:48 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-jobs@freebsd.org Received: from mail.the-i-pa.com (mail.the-i-pa.com [151.201.71.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9FFDB37B417 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 16:42:44 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 46113 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2002 00:38:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO potentialtech.com) (151.201.71.209) by mail.the-i-pa.com with SMTP; 14 Mar 2002 00:38:12 -0000 Message-ID: <3C8FF162.8090801@potentialtech.com> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 19:40:02 -0500 From: Bill Moran Organization: Potential Technology User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:0.9.3) Gecko/20010914 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-jobs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 88 Consulting -- *BSD-based server solutions References: <200203131442.g2DEgTv30343@jhs.muc.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-jobs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Julian Stacey wrote: >I suggest a vote to split this into 2 lists: > > # inc. URLs of CV/ Resumes From Individuals > # Job Descriptions From Employers > >If there's a concensus in favour, I envisage: > - postmaster@freebsd.org will check the thread, confirm the concensus, > clone the jobs@ subscription list to the 2 new lists, & close jobs@. > - Existing subscribers can then use majordomo to unsubscribe > whichever half (if either) they don't want. > >What do others think ? > - Yes, Split. > - No, Do not split. > Why? I don't see any reason to add this complexity. -Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-jobs" in the body of the message