From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Nov 14 12:29:52 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id MAA10358 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 14 Nov 1995 12:29:52 -0800 Received: from brasil.moneng.mei.com (brasil.moneng.mei.com [151.186.20.4]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA10348 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 1995 12:29:45 -0800 Received: (from jgreco@localhost) by brasil.moneng.mei.com (8.7.Beta.1/8.7.Beta.1) id OAA29285; Tue, 14 Nov 1995 14:27:59 -0600 From: Joe Greco Message-Id: <199511142027.OAA29285@brasil.moneng.mei.com> Subject: Re: Multiple http servers - howto ? To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 14:27:58 -0600 (CST) Cc: terry@lambert.org, luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it, hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199511141945.MAA20656@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Nov 14, 95 12:45:40 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > The other thing that isn't taken into account is topology management for > geographically seperate servers: no way to get the least loaded server > cosest to your location to reduce overall network congestion. Very true. > Actually, someone could probably get a nice little paper out of building > an inverse load preferential DNS (and load reporting daemons) if they > wanted to. 8-). Somebody already did, a while ago, but I don't have any references handy. Something I saw once in comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains.... ... JG