From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jun 3 15:53:42 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mail-01.cdsnet.net (mail-01.cdsnet.net [206.107.16.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED72B14EB3 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 1999 15:53:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mrcpu@internetcds.com) Received: (qmail 21200 invoked from network); 3 Jun 1999 22:53:40 -0000 Received: from schizo.cdsnet.net (204.118.244.32) by mail.cdsnet.net with SMTP; 3 Jun 1999 22:53:40 -0000 Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 15:53:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Jaye Mathisen X-Sender: mrcpu@schizo.cdsnet.net To: Garance A Drosihn Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , Matthew Dillon , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Matt's Commit status (was Re: 3.2-stable, panic #12) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I second this. Even if it's a bit painful, somebody who has been working diligently at this needs to be able to be make their work usable quickly. I would guess that not too many things hinder progress, or quash desire more than fixes to problems languishing. There has to be some middle ground somewhere that lets Matt get his fixes in quickly, and still doesn't ruffle too many core feathers. I had the opportunity to hear some of the core side recently, and I certainly sympathize or empathize with the issue, but nobody else has stepped up to fix the NFS problems, and I would like to see this opportunity capitalized on. On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > At 2:08 PM -0700 6/3/99, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > Excellent. Let's assume then that all the core folk who are there, > > I'm not on the core, I'm not a committer, and I won't be at Usenix. > > Still, I'd like to mention that as a freebsd *user*, I have appreciated > the recent NFS-related work that Matt has done. While others seemed To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message