From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 27 04:49:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7551716A4E7 for ; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 04:49:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mwm-keyword-freebsdhackers2.e313df@mired.org) Received: from mired.org (vpn.mired.org [66.92.153.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5AF4443D58 for ; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 04:49:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mwm-keyword-freebsdhackers2.e313df@mired.org) Received: (qmail 7718 invoked by uid 1001); 27 Aug 2006 04:49:18 -0000 Received: by bhuda.mired.org (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1001); Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:49:18 -0400 (EDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17649.9294.285953.182775@bhuda.mired.org> Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:49:18 -0400 To: Steve Kargl In-Reply-To: <20060826212607.GA82729@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <17648.35923.366716.65517@bhuda.mired.org> <20060826180900.GA81762@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <17648.38296.39807.492937@bhuda.mired.org> <20060826192418.GA82155@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <17648.42078.268722.152591@bhuda.mired.org> <20060826212607.GA82729@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 19) "Constant Variable" XEmacs Lucid X-Primary-Address: mwm@mired.org X-face: "5Mnwy%?j>IIV\)A=):rjWL~NB2aH[}Yq8Z=u~vJ`"(,&SiLvbbz2W`; h9L,Yg`+vb1>RG% *h+%X^n0EZd>TM8_IB;a8F?(Fb"lw'IgCoyM.[Lg#r\ X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.3 (Seattle Slew) From: Mike Meyer Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd64 questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 04:49:30 -0000 In <20060826212607.GA82729@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, Steve Kargl typed: > On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 03:43:26PM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote: > >>> Hmm. My copy of the port sets that for amd64 already. Checking the CVS > >>> repository, it looks like a number of things have broken/unbroken in > >>> the last few days. In particular, one of the repositories appears to > >>> have a broken copy of the tarball the port is using. I'll update the > >>> port, make distclean, and try again. > >>> > >>> In the meantime, could you tell me which openoffice port you build? > >>> I'm using openoffice.org-2.0, and not the -devel branch. > >> > >> pkg_info shows > >> openoffice.org-2.0.3 > >> > >> ls -l /usr/local/bin shows that I built the port on 7 Aug 06. > >> Of course, the port could have been broken in the last 20 days. :( > > Just out of curiosity, what are the chances of getting you to build a > > package/tarball out of what you've built, since there isn't a package > > availabe from the freebsd ftp sites? I'd be willing to make it > > available for others to download. > The chances are slim. I'm fairly certain that I deleted everything > after the installation (ie., tarballs, build directories, dependencies). > I'll check, but don't hold your breath. :( For the archives. The openoffice.org-2.0 port just finished building without a hitch on my 6-STABLE amd64 system. I couldn't find anything when I went searchyng for such earlier. Hopefully this one will safe people some time in the future. I'll investigate the issue of multilib and multi-platform package support, and possibly take it up in a more appropriate forum. Thanx, http://www.mired.org/consulting.html Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information.