From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 25 09:40:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1DC7106566C for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 09:40:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C13E08FC16 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 09:40:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8P9e3Eq005890 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 09:40:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o8P9e3DA005889; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 09:40:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 09:40:03 GMT Message-Id: <201009250940.o8P9e3DA005889@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: "Aldis Berjoza" Cc: Subject: Re: ports/150770: [patch] devel/geany v0.19 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Aldis Berjoza List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 09:40:03 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/150770; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Aldis Berjoza" To: bug-followup@freebsd.org, "Andris Raugulis" Cc: Subject: Re: ports/150770: [patch] devel/geany v0.19 Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 12:35:11 +0300 On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 10:27:35 +0300, Andris Raugulis wrote: > P.S. bonus points, Aldis, for rearranging .png's alphabetically. Power of vim :) > 3) this introduces problems with geany-plugins: > > geany-plugins needs update to 0.19+, because at it's current > state (0.18) they won't compile against geany 0.19.1. As Aldis, > initial patch sender, is maintainer of that port, he needs to > update it to 0.19. > > I heard from him that debug plugin is broken. If so, in my opinion, > geany-plugins needs update anyway plus sign that option as broken > while we can figure out and fix that particular plugin, otherwise > geany can't be updated without breaking geany-plugins. > > Thoughts, Aldis & Edwin? I will send pr for geany-plugins in about hour. Also I'd like to suggest to edit category for geany (if you accept this I will modify geany-plugins category as well) I suggest modifying categories to: CATEGORIES= devel editors or even better CATEGORIES= editors devel Which effectively moves geany to editors (after all it is an editor) What do you think? -- Aldis Berjoza