Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 28 Feb 2002 01:27:26 -0800 (PST)
From:      Johann Frisch <jerfa@yahoo.com>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Pentium and NO_F00F_HACK = kernel panic
Message-ID:  <20020228092726.2B33037B402@hub.freebsd.org>
References:  <20020227213355.EAAC837B405@hub.freebsd.org> <200202280123.RAA79623@star-one.liberator.dyndns.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28 Feb 2002, you wrote in internal.freebsd.stable:

> If you have a Pentium with the bug, then you don't want this
> option.  By doing this you've eliminated the code that makes you
> unsusceptible to the bug.  (Stated another way for clarity, the
> "F00F hack" works around the CPU bug; the NO_F00F_HACK option
> disables the workaround.)

I knew that and I have no problem using this option. I am just curious
if this kernel behaviour is intented or not?
-- 
MfG,
Johann

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020228092726.2B33037B402>