From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec  4 13:33:14 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id ACB5416A4CE; Thu,  4 Dec 2003 13:33:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lakemtao05.cox.net (lakemtao05.cox.net [68.1.17.116])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3B36D43FE0; Thu,  4 Dec 2003 13:33:11 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mezz7@cox.net)
Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([68.103.32.11]) by lakemtao05.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP
          id <20031204213306.JTGF29834.lakemtao05.cox.net@mezz.mezzweb.com>;
          Thu, 4 Dec 2003 16:33:06 -0500
To: Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com>
References: <1070573010.28210.1.camel@blue.mcneil.com>
Message-ID: <oprzod39gi8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net>
From: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 15:32:23 -0600
In-Reply-To: <1070573010.28210.1.camel@blue.mcneil.com>
User-Agent: Opera7.23/Linux M2 build 518
cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org
cc: DougB@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: xscreensaver
X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining
	<freebsd-gnome.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome>,
	<mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome>,
	<mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 21:33:14 -0000

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 13:23:30 -0800, Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Can we remove the --without-pam from xscreensaver and xscreensaver-gnome
> now?  It cripples systems using LDAP.

Does they build with pam support/enable by default? If yes, then I 
disagree for to remove the --without-pam. I only will support to add the 
WITH_PAM define, but by default the pam should be disable.

Cheers,
Mezz

> Thanks,
> Sean


-- 
bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.