From owner-freebsd-standards Tue Feb 26 23:59:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D0237B400; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 23:59:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA12248; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 18:56:58 +1100 Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 18:57:27 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: To: "M. Warner Losh" Cc: , Subject: Re: Garrett's POSIX versions patch for review In-Reply-To: <20020226.224449.28794535.imp@village.org> Message-ID: <20020227184645.K47808-100000@gamplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote: > I think that these diffs look good on the surface. I agree that it > would be nice to have a prisitine c99 env, but if that's hard to do, > then I don't see waiting the rest of the changes. I think they look bad on the surface :-). E.g., using #if defined (...) instead of #ifdef, and indenting preprocessor code are style bugs. There are superflous underscores. I don't remember any technical problems from when I reviewed the first version of Garrett's patch. The new __FOO_VISIBLE macros are much easier to use than the old _FOO_VISIBLE[_BAR] ones. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message