From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 8 10:05:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22211106568B for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 10:05:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eitanadlerlist@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A168FC0A for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 10:05:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so114346fga.13 for ; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 02:05:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=gyu9aSxuIhk/y2+BYMKbS9dfaVx7bEF4uJMnVSpbsAs=; b=jMvbvQu3RU7YjqkHePmQCfcrA5OgVd0n/gdvGQ/1tnh9LAFr4GtvrT0T5uGxMPeCiK kZv7vu0CV24+YglsSIyvWB1PAtM1R/gWa99R7BbER0sNo6+SdmS+rJzBdwJV6Ks3jyNL iNUgZt1P5Uh2k4YUwWSs8B2wg6lFC0Xtj8r5k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=lFc+Hj4X74u3pJEOMaOJLH92XKPtUNFM+r0ptBoEOYZW0CzngP38r4GVOC8bBfxg8t fsRpvGn2hYgObT7uetJ+6koljrJyZQtvR3KDZ9DLKsu7uHxtiZT5q+dwzWI0OjEFqp/q rDyrH7nkiKiQFrqSWS3UK/Cfuy09jTACtz3FU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.130.209 with SMTP id 17mr615587hbk.186.1265623551199; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 02:05:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B6F3C19.708@FreeBSD.org> References: <4B6F3C19.708@FreeBSD.org> From: Eitan Adler Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 12:05:31 +0200 Message-ID: To: Doug Barton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: better way to handle required rebuild on library bump X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:05:53 -0000 With due respect to the creativity of the OP, the whole conversation is basically moot since in almost all cases a library major version change requires a change to the LIB_DEPENDS line in the port anyway, so a PORTREVISION bump is a very tiny bit of additional work. Ah, I did not realize this. As you said my point is moot anyway.