From owner-freebsd-current Sun Nov 16 17:21:52 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA29374 for current-outgoing; Sun, 16 Nov 1997 17:21:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA29367 for ; Sun, 16 Nov 1997 17:21:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.v-site.net [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA00618; Sun, 16 Nov 1997 17:21:32 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199711170121.RAA00618@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96 To: "John S. Dyson" cc: sprice@hiwaay.net (Steve Price), smp@csn.net, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make world time???/ In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 16 Nov 1997 19:35:05 EST." <199711170035.TAA24705@dyson.iquest.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 17:21:31 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hmm... I do a make world in about 75 minutes -- I just didn't do profiled libraries. My system: PPro 200mhz 48MB, Seagate Cheetah 4.3GB UW (10000) /usr mounted async noatime CFLAGS= -O -pipe I noticed that my system is very cpu bound when I do a make world. So it will be very nice to find out what a dual PPro 200Mhz system with fast disks can do . Cheers, Amancio > Steve Price said: > > > > I just saw this and I wanted to say thanks to you, Peter, and the > > rest of the SMP team. I installed my second P5-166 in my machine > > at work and about 30 minutes later (after rebuilding the kernel) > > I was up and running with both CPUs and no hiccups so far. > > > > [insert crowd_cheering_at_95dB.wav here] > > > > BTW, here are my results with 'make -j8 -k world' from that night: > > > > make world started on Fri Now 14 19:27:31 CST 1997 > > ... > > make world completed on Fri Nov 14 21:21:26 CST 1997 > > > > Just under 2H, I'd say that pretty much kicks b*tt. :) > > > > Steve > > > That is SUPER for dual P5!!! Not to speak religion here, but imagine that > P5's normally share the 2nd level cache. There are probably people with > dual P6 machines that don't do much better that that... Great! > > -- > John > dyson@freebsd.org > jdyson@nc.com