From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jan 21 7:42:56 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40CF037B402 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 07:42:51 -0800 (PST) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0LFgjE37518; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 18:42:45 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 18:42:44 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: mark@grondar.za, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Step6, corresponding /etc/pam.d/* fixes for review Message-ID: <20020121154244.GC37234@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20020121142038.GA36519@nagual.pp.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 16:33:57 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > 1) there's no reason to have pam_opie commented out now, it won't do One reason still exist: all users (i.e. non-OPIE too) will see OTP responses when pam_opie will be uncommented. It may leads to confusion or wrong automated scripts processing. I have idea to solve it adding "no_fake_prompts" option to pam_opie to control that per admin choice. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message