From owner-freebsd-doc Thu Aug 16 9:37:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E184B37B40D; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 09:37:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f7GGbax41307; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 19:37:36 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 19:37:36 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: John Baldwin Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/29767: incorrect description of 'standart-supfile' Message-ID: <20010816193735.O73183@sunbay.com> References: <200108160800.f7G803398475@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from jhb@FreeBSD.org on Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 07:59:07AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 07:59:07AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 16-Aug-01 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > The following reply was made to PR docs/29767; it has been noted by GNATS. > > > > From: Ruslan Ermilov > > To: Olexandr Kunytsa > > Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG > > Subject: Re: docs/29767: incorrect description of 'standart-supfile' > > Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 10:58:13 +0300 > > > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 10:43:03AM +0300, Olexandr Kunytsa wrote: > > > > > > standard-supfile in -stable now gets you the -stable sources, but it > > > is pointed inside the file that it contains "CVSup collections" for > > > current-sources. > > > > > And also in README. I think that either > > > > standard-supfile should be deleted from -STABLE > > > > *OR* > > standard-supfile should be (repo)moved to current-supfile > > in -CURRENT, and MFC'ed to -STABLE. With corrections to > > README. > > Erm, in the original discussion about this, there was the point that > 'standard-supfile' was supposed to follow whatever current branch you were on > at the time. Thus, on 4.x, standard-supfile follows RELENG_4, on 4.3, it > follows RELENG_4_3, and on -current it follows HEAD. > But it doesn't, in fact, follows 4.3 on RELENG_4_3, it's still set to RELENG_4 there. Nor it is to fetch RELENG_4_3 in RELENG_4_3_0_RELEASE. And `standard' comes yet from `crypto' times, it assumes `non-standard'. How about this? For X.Y release, that would be: release-supfile RELENG_X_Y_RELEASE bugfix-supfile RELENG_X_Y stable-supfile RELENG_X current-supfile . For -CURRENT, only stable-supfile and current-supfile make sense probably. Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message