From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Mar  8 18:58:53 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F6A16A4CE
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue,  8 Mar 2005 18:58:53 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [65.205.34.180])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7FCB43D46
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue,  8 Mar 2005 18:58:52 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from vivek@khera.org)
Received: from [192.168.7.150] (host-150.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.150])
	by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25944B850;
	Tue,  8 Mar 2005 13:58:51 -0500 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <200503042003.59130.ler@lerctr.org>
References: <200503042003.59130.ler@lerctr.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <b13d427a5a0afb80167bbb37f05fd973@khera.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 13:58:54 -0500
To: Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2)
cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: mail/mailman WITH_HTDIG: Unfetchable patch?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 18:58:53 -0000


On Mar 4, 2005, at 9:03 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote:

> I tried(!) to install the mail/mailman port with the HTDIG 
> Integration, but it
> couldn't grab the patches.
>
> Can someone look into it?
>
> (this is with a ports tree CVSup'd this afternoon US/Central).
>

That part of the Mailman port was contributed.  I don't use it, so if 
it remains broken, it will have to be excised from the port.  Anyone is 
welcome to submit patches to make it work again.