From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 21:04:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A54F3D12 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:04:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com (mail-ee0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8648FC08 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:04:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f54.google.com with SMTP id c13so3066025eek.13 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:04:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vuCI9/EfBi/4ZfvpV8bdo9EGTIBNiGJ6Bu6pflhrMoU=; b=Z+oiipMhoTsjz3RWvvH6uyXfF5ecfg4K57H4dBsvBDWs2ecCDaXIjLthjjGDtQTFsZ rO/tWD8BINlpj2ge7NFbgaVJQJnGKBFK8NLJPM2AW8yB7CGhZr0ItPXKo+6dvqPj//QQ 9zvoMx7FwAd3Ht1GycpeIQa1Jwxb0OUpLG9uyihrwt6L4nMI2vxW0cSRjGOyizq7wAo2 SwJlmHkB5yJ/ACO27t1lCWHIkN+e8Ls1EiRRajdFP09epduz2hrzLBQnFhSXucNGesey 0I4GOGq7HGZ0S1b92CD31k6TYnbtLT4lp1foFLHhRM48TH1x7NdX7taBOjMqEqGJWkSm nW0w== Received: by 10.14.219.3 with SMTP id l3mr63667483eep.5.1355259891046; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:04:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b49sm52052814eem.16.2012.12.11.13.04.48 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:04:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:04:46 +0000 From: RW To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC/HEADSUP] portmaster default -w (preserve shared libraries) Message-ID: <20121211210446.15c3f2be@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <50C7871B.9030706@FreeBSD.org> References: <50C7576C.5040100@FreeBSD.org> <50C762C4.9080302@FreeBSD.org> <50C7871B.9030706@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:04:53 -0000 On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:18:51 +0100 Alex Dupre wrote: > For simple ports it may works correctly, but for others it could > happen that finally both revisions are linked into a library or > executable (because one !recompiled dependency depends on the old > version and another recompiled dependency depends on the new version) > and this is not good. So the correct thing is to always recompile > ports to get the new version, the 'keep old libs' flags should be > used with caution (this is why I prefer it to be opt-in and not > opt-out). The main reason for keeping the libraries is that it reduces the number of breakages during the upgrade process, which can be a very serious inconvenience, particularly if the forced update fails to complete. In my experience the problem you describe is much less significant.