From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Aug 21 04:51:32 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id EAA14949 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 21 Aug 1995 04:51:32 -0700 Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11]) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with SMTP id EAA14941 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 1995 04:51:27 -0700 Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA08940 (5.67a/IDA-1.5); Mon, 21 Aug 1995 06:33:29 -0500 Received: by bonkers.taronga.com (smail2.5p) id AA08305; 21 Aug 95 06:05:36 CDT (Mon) Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id GAA08302; Mon, 21 Aug 1995 06:05:35 -0500 From: Peter da Silva Message-Id: <199508211105.GAA08302@bonkers.taronga.com> Subject: Re: Any reason we can't enable the bus mouse by default? To: imp@village.org (Warner Losh) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 1995 06:05:34 -0500 (CDT) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199508210315.VAA01937@rover.village.org> from "Warner Losh" at Aug 20, 95 09:15:21 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 439 Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > m4 isn't bad, imho. Given what it has done with the sendmail.cf file > mess, I think it might be a fruitful path to follow. Please, no. It's taken the sendmail.cf file mess ane made it even *more* confusing. M4 is a useful tool, but the sendmail.cf configuration is a perfect example of extreme macro abuse. The second worst example I know of (the worst being Imake... at least with the sendmail files the language wasn't C-specific).