From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 3 17:47:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9528110656DC for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 17:47:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@amdmi3.ru) Received: from smtp.timeweb.ru (smtp.timeweb.ru [217.170.79.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 508BC8FC17 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 17:47:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@amdmi3.ru) Received: from [213.148.20.85] (helo=hive.panopticon) by smtp.timeweb.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LeYik-0000am-Mo for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 20:47:58 +0300 Received: from hades.panopticon (hades.panopticon [192.168.0.32]) by hive.panopticon (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE5EC1C12 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 20:47:05 +0300 (MSK) Received: by hades.panopticon (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AF306108839; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 20:47:15 +0300 (MSK) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 20:47:15 +0300 From: Dmitry Marakasov To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090303174715.GD55713@hades.panopticon> References: <20090303072936.0e154820@scorpio> <20090303153739.GC55713@hades.panopticon> <20090303114755.326b7c7d@scorpio> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090303114755.326b7c7d@scorpio> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Subject: Re: Configuring 'RUN_DEPENDS' X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:47:58 -0000 * Jerry (gesbbb@yahoo.com) wrote: > >No, you don't. clamav and clamav-devel are conflicting ports that > >install the same files, so should you depend on clamav as > > > >RUN_DEPENDS= clamscan:${PORTSDIR}/security/clamav > >or > >LIB_DEPENDS= clamav:${PORTSDIR}/security/clamav > > OK, I understand what you are saying. However, the script that the port > will install requires a version of Clamav >= 0.94.2 to work. Would > prefixing either clamscan or clamav with >=0.94.2 work? Unfortunately, > I am not at the computer where the test Makefile, etc. is located to > try it out myself. As far as I understand, that won't work with clamav-devel. RUN_DEPENDS= clamav>=0.94.2:${PORTSDIR}/security/clamav makes a port depend not on installed file but on specific package, so clamav-devel will likely not match this rule. I think there's no need in such strict dependency, as clamav 0.94.2 is in the tree for 3 months already. -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amdmi3@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amdmi3@jabber.ru http://www.amdmi3.ru