Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 10:06:41 -0500 From: "Joe & Fhe Barbish" <barbish@a1poweruser.com> To: "Joel Dinel" <dinjo@touchtunes.com> Cc: "FBSDQ" <questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: Basic load balancing with IPFW Message-ID: <LPBBIGIAAKKEOEJOLEGOIEKDCLAA.barbish@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <20020322095153.A39407@sunder.touchtunes.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
You really should take more time to comprehend the meaning of what these articles are implying. Load balancing IS the result of bandwidth throttling. Just think about it. Oh well, you know the old saying, you can lead a horse to water but you can not make him drink. -----Original Message----- From: Joel Dinel [mailto:dinjo@touchtunes.com] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 9:52 AM To: Joe & Fhe Barbish Subject: Re: Basic load balancing with IPFW On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 09:42:03AM -0500, Joe & Fhe Barbish wrote: > Start here > http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2001/07/26/Big_Scary_Daemons.html > > > Finish up here > http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ip_dummynet/ ---end quoted text--- Well, thanks for the links but I just read both articles, and neither of them deal with load balancing, or round-robin'ing incoming connections to a same port. Those links are for (mostly) bandwitdh throttling. -- Joel Dinel System Administrator TouchTunes Digital Jukebox, Inc. GnuPG key : http://lysander.mine.nu/~kint/mykey.asc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?LPBBIGIAAKKEOEJOLEGOIEKDCLAA.barbish>