From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jan 3 11:20:34 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F4E37B617; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:20:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from InterJet.elischer.org ([12.232.206.8]) by rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020103192019.HYWF20119.rwcrmhc51.attbi.com@InterJet.elischer.org>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 19:20:19 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA24295; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:11:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:11:57 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: Terry Lambert Cc: Matthew Dillon , John Baldwin , Peter Jeremy , Michal Mertl , Bruce Evans , Mike Smith , Bernd Walter , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: When to use atomic_ functions? (was: 64 bit counters) In-Reply-To: <3C33DA68.8E9700D4@mindspring.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It's interresti gthat the major antagonists here are all withon 70 km (Terry are you still in Foster City?) why not just get together with a whiteboard somewhere (here?) and hack out the locking strategies over a few cups of coffee? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message