From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 22 21:28:04 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C67137B401 for ; Sun, 22 Jun 2003 21:28:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhost.schluting.com (spooge.kittenz.pdx.edu [131.252.211.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F36E43F93 for ; Sun, 22 Jun 2003 21:28:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from charlie@schluting.com) Received: from schluting.com (12-241-194-239.client.attbi.com [12.241.194.239]) by mailhost.schluting.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C8852126 for ; Sun, 22 Jun 2003 21:27:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3EF681A5.2070209@schluting.com> Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 21:27:17 -0700 From: Charlie Schluting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20030622140245.P95610@spooge.kittenz.pdx.edu> <20030622231658.GB10541@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030622172354.Y5762@spooge.kittenz.pdx.edu> <200306221812.27413.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <200306221812.27413.kstewart@owt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Make buildworld fails (many times) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 04:28:04 -0000 Kent Stewart wrote: > It doesn't matter. My rule is that if you are the only one with problems, it > is your computer that has the problem. There haven't been a number of > complaints of buildworld failures in -current, which is where they would be > if 5.x was failing. > > In the past, IIRC, many of the K6 450 users had to underclock them to get them > stable. > > Kent > Thanks for the help. I also found some info in the Sig11 doc about having to run these POS procs @ 400MHz (still more than enough for my NAT router / firewall). Oh well, that will have to wait for another weekend :) --Charlie