From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 18 12:00:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE1E106564A for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:00:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5A748FC16 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:00:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgi16 with SMTP id 16so1661900wgi.31 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 05:00:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=9TiyG6NXhwNs/q6cMmzEXMcb+I9oBf5Y95zinreEpKw=; b=oL1P/YlWHTjKDFqQePoculKGPDL99iIm7qZKu1x6HLGXi1iQswKwBFElvp1Z4iUWYX UgLAWDJkei/d5GG+G1cipmOYmwqbWn9LYDTXr3kTROX1Hz2CPl/YtOzdT2QLYxDkntST DZM7AlmSiXYSlbchCaP+2S76i9PW7+J53AY/TvvnMUvMkB7JtmvS1+/aT4VUMO19kin7 drd+3zyHtR+UYeMPEmgdM6l6Mvq6sZt8MZXBtC+/1G9NGab5BiuPikZzqQkpSI02ntvk tdFFC8qhZipDZdyhsh6kR/JiK3ZIQbYXC5byKbpU+/O1gqATcq/T6jqVofyAx8Gu3aJs +3tQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.104.197 with SMTP id gg5mr22888240wib.9.1347969608440; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 05:00:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.129.3 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 05:00:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <75ca1e92e2a51857615e193434898bf5@homey.local> References: <780066C6E2FAB67A997876B7@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local> <20567.50041.903201.979498@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <75ca1e92e2a51857615e193434898bf5@homey.local> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 05:00:08 -0700 Message-ID: From: Michael Sierchio To: Stas Verberkt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmOq2gJc9p+M8oGTuF1WlK9JnAaPEpAfXNMvnrjfYs8Cfl1hEqqkT/yblOHFzsUJkBUvo02 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What replaces csup? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:00:10 -0000 We are really behind the curve here. Git assumes (correctly) that disk space is inexpensive, much cheaper per byte than network bandwidth. By the time we adopt SVN completely, every serious project I know of will have moved from subversion to git. ;-) - M On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Stas Verberkt wrote: > Warren Block schreef op : > >> The difference is that a local svn checkout has all the commit >> history. A comparison recently showed 700-some megabytes more space >> used by the svn checkout. >> > Although I believe the checkouts are bigger, I do not think they have > all the commit history. This is where SVN and CVS differ from systems > like Git or Mercury, which have all the history in a local working > copy. I think the overhead of SVN consists of backups and cached > copies of the previous revision, but I am not quite sure. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"