From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jan 1 19:59:00 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A748F1426BB8 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2019 19:59:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 232BA83AFF for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2019 19:59:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.91 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1geQBp-000Pks-67; Tue, 01 Jan 2019 20:59:01 +0100 Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2019 20:59:01 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Adam Weinberger Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Poudriere very slow when building in i386 jails Message-ID: <20190101195901.GO84895@home.opsec.eu> References: <20181231195011.GI84895@home.opsec.eu> <20181231211516.GJ84895@home.opsec.eu> <0IcOmQLiDHIXsW_vzCi2RBHRHl8vWpGQn9M_G6T-wm4OZKWWij8JkKol9780Ou45l4ycEqeecG-DGRL73St2EF_MmSz5rc_PL-cN_ODQ4E8=@protonmail.ch> <20190101053029.GK84895@home.opsec.eu> <20190101182238.GM84895@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2019 19:59:00 -0000 Hi! > > > I have found the real cause of most of the problems: it's ccache configuration. > > > > Thanks for the update. I've never used ccache, but I've changed my > > setup to test this 8-} > > I've been bitten by this in the past with that exact scenario, except > it also slowed the amd64 builds to a crawl as well. Kurt, if you can > confirm this behaviour then perhaps it's worth mentioning in > poudriere.conf or poudriere(8). I can't confirm it, as I try to go for a per-jail-ccache-directory setup that Lorenzo described. I guess ccache and the per-jail-use in poudriere should be described in more detail in the man page. -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 One year to go !