From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Sep 21 9:18:23 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from picnic.mat.net (picnic.mat.net [206.246.122.133]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A86CC14E47 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 09:18:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chuckr@mat.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by picnic.mat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA09079; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 12:17:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from chuckr@mat.net) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 12:17:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Chuck Robey To: John-Mark Gurney Cc: Julian Elischer , Boris Popov , "Matthew N. Dodd" , Warner Losh , Matthew Dillon , Wayne Cuddy , FreeBSD Hackers List Subject: Re: what is devfs? In-Reply-To: <19990921000942.56103@hydrogen.fircrest.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Can everybody please remember that the argument about whether persistence is good, or the devil's invention, has already been totally beaten to death, and it's in the mail archives. Most of you have been working towards defining an acceptable compromise, but if your post gives your opinion about persistence, please save it, you're doing us no service! We don't need more heat on the question, we need a path to solution. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chuck Robey | Interests include C programming, Electronics, 213 Lakeside Dr. Apt. T-1 | communications, and signal processing. Greenbelt, MD 20770 | I run picnic.mat.net: FreeBSD-current(i386) and (301) 220-2114 | jaunt.mat.net : FreeBSD-current(Alpha) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message