Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 02:22:17 -0600 From: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net> To: Dung Patrick <dkt@digitalme.com> Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about threads [beaver challenge] Message-ID: <opr25avfzm8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net> In-Reply-To: <1076398781.b793f9a0dkt@digitalme.com> References: <1076398781.b793f9a0dkt@digitalme.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 15:39:41 +0800, Dung Patrick <dkt@digitalme.com> wrote: > Hi, we are using FreeBSD 5.2p2, with a Dual P4 Xeon. I personal think you should go for 5.2-CURRENT; not 5.2(.1)-RELEASE branch. -CURRENT is faster in my benchmark test, of course with the disable debug and malloc.conf->aj. There are few performance optimizations that committed in -CURRENT after 5.2 released. Cheers, Mezz > There are some questions: > > 1a) Is it stable to use KSE with mySQL? > 1b) It is true that LinuxThreads with mySQL is faster than libc_r? > 2) Should HTT be used or just plain SMP? > 3) Should ULE be used over 4BSD? > 4) What are these options, and their effect: > kern.threads.max_threads_per_proc > kern.threads.max_groups_per_proc > kern.threads.max_threads_hits > > Regards > Patrick -- bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?opr25avfzm8ckrg5>