From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 9 11:57:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11A1106566B for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 11:57:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-gg0-f182.google.com (mail-gg0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 762368FC08 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 11:57:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnm2 with SMTP id m2so141037ggn.13 for ; Wed, 09 May 2012 04:57:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=GdvbS4whbiXrKlP1ia8MmWQHlET51gHYRJe4efQO3gY=; b=KoLfs3sElRCqx6zTnMEmD1gEY8mTOV8ggv4eLcet/pfwub7XeoGu8L6GQunJGQ5gj5 7XhFVldFk2dNLLNvJ4IsXb2GZEHjxIY7mB/H2p14yH97WTWXpB2VD3Q+OEVYo54dfvcv Je9rkUYZKPIZrFcWPlc3vAi/9b1wL5TbjDT/klHocMcnlE1Q55PLJuETRwNgLWYMCGz6 0tiubBXNZ2lsK7sZK0ajk2QTbrk4mxSLocGSuGq7mQfJG7iDQjMUIwIAPGEX2VKtRR57 wbfrFdJwLewxeTi/99jgi3yJi/9ewkVmGx7FC4QGzmrWdupBlarCYAQzO7wxMhr17L3G iA+g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.197.233 with SMTP id ix9mr12725107igc.26.1336564626792; Wed, 09 May 2012 04:57:06 -0700 (PDT) Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.231.74.138 with HTTP; Wed, 9 May 2012 04:57:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201205031335.q43DZUKx025041@mail.r-bonomi.com> Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 07:57:06 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: N3f9J8yijjhnGotGWm3dWyLjUkA Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: Robert Bonomi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkSR19fnbz1c3D3hQ2O0RbMhWEWs86a6reQFNaC4iFaEMTCGVnHEGpb7MJZzQiruPdGPAz5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS Crash and directories now missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 11:57:09 -0000 On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote: > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Robert Bonomi = wrote: >> [...] >> One comment: for 'defensive' purposes it would be useful to break ad6 up >> into two slices, putting 'basejail' in it's own slice. =A0Then, for prod= uction >> use, that slice can be mounted RO, and with the 'system immutable' flag >> set on everything in that filesystem. >> > > Yes. From one of your posts that became somewhat clear to me: Having > all the jails on a single 150GB slice seems like a bad idea. > For your recommendation above, what are the advantages or differences of slicing the disk versus partitioning on a single slice? Thanks, --=20 Alejandro Imass