From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 30 21:11:21 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CD116A4CE; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:11:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from saturn.criticalmagic.com (saturn.criticalmagic.com [68.213.16.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B92643FB1; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:11:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from richardcoleman@mindspring.com) Received: from mindspring.com (titan.criticalmagic.com [68.213.16.23]) by saturn.criticalmagic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4253BD10; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 00:11:18 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3FCACD85.2040600@mindspring.com> Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 00:11:33 -0500 From: Richard Coleman Organization: Critical Magic, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org References: <20031201092813.X355@sbk-gw.sibnet.ru> <20031201045952.GB42765@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20031201045952.GB42765@dragon.nuxi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Oliver Eikemeier cc: Kris Kennaway cc: "Maxim M. Kazachek" Subject: Re: Ports startup scripts in /etc/rc.d (Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: richardcoleman@mindspring.com List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 05:11:22 -0000 David O'Brien wrote: >>For 5.2-CURRENT, I think we should revisit this issue with one of the >>following conclusions winning out, and the rest being discarded as >>flame-bait: >> >>(1) Combine / and /usr into a single file system by default, and add >> /usr/local/etc/rc.d to the search order, with appropriate hacks to >> handle old-style scripts. The devil will be in the bikeshed, but the >> implementation is easy, except for the bit where we explain that >> NFS-mounted /usr/local won't work too well. > > > I would like to show support for this option. I've been running /usr on > the / partition on *all* my FBSD machines for the past 4 years. The > reasons for having a separate / and /usr just don't apply today. Disks > are large enough to hold both, and UFS(FFS) is stable. > > Sun and SGI both combine / and /usr on their pre-installed workstation > machines. That abandons the ability to have a read-only /usr. Richard Coleman richardcoleman@mindspring.com