From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 9 16:42:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4E516A4D0 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 16:42:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 410B243D31 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 16:42:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from [212.227.126.155] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BuDET-0001Zx-00; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 18:42:45 +0200 Received: from [217.227.146.85] (helo=donor.laier.local) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BuDES-0007ei-00; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 18:42:44 +0200 From: Max Laier To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 18:40:46 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <411722A1.1020108@mra.co.id> In-Reply-To: <411722A1.1020108@mra.co.id> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_Vk6FB2BS8tKqjix"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200408091840.53308.max@love2party.net> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:61c499deaeeba3ba5be80f48ecc83056 cc: Muhammad Reza Subject: Re: pf and ipfw X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 16:42:47 -0000 --Boundary-02=_Vk6FB2BS8tKqjix Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 09 August 2004 09:07, Muhammad Reza wrote: > Dear Lists, > > can pf rule work together with ipfw rules ? > i need pf rule to do some outgoing load balance, but still need ipfw to > do some basic packet filtering, cause i have difficulty to set pf rules > default to block if it's apply with load balancing rules. > please enlight me.. While it is possible to use pf and ipfw in conjunction, it is certainly=20 preferable to settle for either one on its own. It should not be too much o= f=20 a problem to get pf to do what you want/need. If you have more specific=20 questions you can post to pf4freebsd@freelists.org =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --Boundary-02=_Vk6FB2BS8tKqjix Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBF6kVXyyEoT62BG0RAub7AJ9k33v+UUYwZLVX1p1xCmkz2ql/RwCffkAj Wleq1V0CeF7IyKWuXBJGipk= =nn7H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_Vk6FB2BS8tKqjix--