From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Feb 7 20:20:03 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1609022CE09 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 20:20:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhurlin@gwdg.de) Received: from kmailer.gwdg.de (kmailer.gwdg.de [134.76.11.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48Dmr15shgz3yKF for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 20:20:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhurlin@gwdg.de) Received: from excmbx-03.um.gwdg.de ([134.76.9.218] helo=email.gwdg.de) by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtp (GWDG Mailer) (envelope-from ) id 1j0A6Y-0007D1-4D; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 21:19:58 +0100 Received: from krabat.raven.hur (10.250.9.199) by EXCMBX-03.um.gwdg.de (134.76.9.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1913.5; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 21:19:57 +0100 Subject: Re: OpenSSL multiple names? To: "@lbutlr" , FreeBSD References: <0AF06B02-4203-4CF1-9F73-6B6D95283F3E@kreme.com> <20200207005501.j5avkiietunh5ipz@icepick.vmeta.jp> <944CDA27-93F9-4E02-B799-F8FD37D42D61@kreme.com> From: Rainer Hurling Message-ID: <5c40981d-b87a-9351-1579-0e0a6e552b8c@gwdg.de> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 21:19:52 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <944CDA27-93F9-4E02-B799-F8FD37D42D61@kreme.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.250.9.199] X-ClientProxiedBy: EXCMBX-03.um.gwdg.de (134.76.9.218) To EXCMBX-03.um.gwdg.de (134.76.9.218) X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by clamav X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48Dmr15shgz3yKF X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rhurlin@gwdg.de designates 134.76.11.26 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rhurlin@gwdg.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.37 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:134.76.10.0/23]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gwdg.de]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[26.11.76.134.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.11.2]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:680, ipnet:134.76.0.0/16, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.87)[ipnet: 134.76.0.0/16(-4.41), asn: 680(0.08), country: DE(-0.02)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 20:20:03 -0000 Am 07.02.20 um 19:16 schrieb @lbutlr: > On 07 Feb 2020, at 11:06, @lbutlr wrote: >> I updated openssl in January, and as I said it has been recompiled several times > > To be clear, I did everything that UPDATING 20200101 mentions, including reinstalling all ports, changing make.conf, etc. > > But all along, the system has reported that the version is openssl111-1.1.1, until 05 Feb. BTW, there is no new version of openssl listed in Postmaster and the distill in security/openssl says the date is Wed Sep 11 02:04:23 MDT 2019. > > 👹 root # cat security/openssl/distinfo [11:14] [/usr/ports] > TIMESTAMP = 1568189063 > SHA256 (openssl-1.1.1d.tar.gz) = 1e3a91bc1f9dfce01af26026f856e064eab4c8ee0a8f457b5ae30b40b8b711f2 > SIZE (openssl-1.1.1d.tar.gz) = 8845861 > > > Did you try 'portmaster -o security/openssl openssl111-1.1.1d' (with DEFAULT_VERSIONS= ssl=openssl, instead ssl=openssl111)? For me, that worked.