From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 2 22:37:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4146016A4CE for ; Sun, 2 May 2004 22:37:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gamera.svk.isite.net (mail.isite.net [205.217.158.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AEA943D4C for ; Sun, 2 May 2004 22:37:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jrhett@isite.net) Received: from anubis.svk.isite.net (anubis.svk.isite.net [205.217.158.5]) by gamera.svk.isite.net (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i435bUqa025614 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 2 May 2004 22:37:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from anubis.svk.isite.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i435bU0G024738; Sun, 2 May 2004 22:37:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jrhett@localhost)i435bTSC024737; Sun, 2 May 2004 22:37:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 22:37:29 -0700 From: Joe Rhett To: Marty Landman Message-ID: <20040503053729.GC23559@isite.net> Mail-Followup-To: Marty Landman , Mikkel Christensen , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200404262126.36157.mikkel@talkactive.net> <200404291406.58150.mikkel@talkactive.net> <6.0.0.22.0.20040429101444.0e68a6a0@pop.face2interface.com> <200404291713.13999.mikkel@talkactive.net> <6.0.0.22.0.20040429140657.11cf1120@pop.face2interface.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.0.20040429140657.11cf1120@pop.face2interface.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Organization: Isite Services, Inc. cc: Mikkel Christensen cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Suexec with Apache 1.3.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 05:37:34 -0000 On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 02:20:14PM -0400, Marty Landman wrote: > On the side, this makes me wonder what the philosophy is on Windows servers > where the whole permissions concept is nonexistent afaik. Because suexec isn't really possible in that environment, so they have no options at all. When you can't get there from here, you don't bother contemplating it. -- Joe Rhett Chief Geek JRhett@Isite.Net Isite Services, Inc.