From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 10 22:43:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6348616A4CE for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 22:43:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp11.wanadoo.fr (smtp11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D9B43D3F for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 22:43:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1112.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 5CD131C000A0 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:43:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf1112.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 40D531C0009C for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:43:04 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20050210224304265.40D531C0009C@mwinf1112.wanadoo.fr Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:43:03 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1596515627.20050210234303@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050210153130.68c6a6b9@jacob.6texans.net> References: <200502092223.01650.algould@datawok.com> <1531112695.20050210212532@wanadoo.fr> <20050210153130.68c6a6b9@jacob.6texans.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Please don't change Beastie to another logo such asNetBSD!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 22:43:05 -0000 Jacob S writes: > And a very poor example, IMHO. I look forward to seeing yours. > Can you give any proof that it's a valid example to say that > Christians object to the use of the acronym "daemon" in Unix-like > operating systems? I have not been able to find any proof on this > list, the 19 Linux e-mail lists I am on, or the 2 or 3 > computer/programming forums I occasionally visit. I don't know what they think of the word daemon, and that was not the topic of the discussion. I was talking about logos. -- Anthony