From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Mar 18 16:04:02 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92FB11065674;
	Sun, 18 Mar 2012 16:04:02 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from locore.org (ns01.locore.org [218.45.21.227])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F7028FC20;
	Sun, 18 Mar 2012 16:04:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (celeron.v4.locore.org [192.168.0.10])
	by locore.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/iwasaki) with ESMTP/inet id q2IG3rVE081994;
	Mon, 19 Mar 2012 01:03:53 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 01:03:52 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20120319.010352.124006046.iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org>
To: bschmidt@freebsd.org
From: Mitsuru IWASAKI <iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <201203171232.42515.bschmidt@freebsd.org>
References: <CAAgh0_YaqjXH=yA5Aq7kTcZSik4YE8JTKSSnFRtRsBtMXnPoSQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120316.230547.41627417.iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org>
	<201203171232.42515.bschmidt@freebsd.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [patch] iwi(4) suspend/resume broken
X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack,
	tools device driver development." <freebsd-wireless.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-wireless-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-wireless>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-wireless-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-wireless-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 16:04:02 -0000

Hi,

> I'd really prefer calling ieee80211_stop/init() in the suspend/resume
> functions, while the driver is not holding the lock (net80211 might
> call into the driver again).
> 
> I roughly checked a few things and I even think that calling
> ieee80211_stop_all() might be enough. Still playing around though.

OK, then I wouldn't commit my patches, I would wait for your patches to
test here.
Or may I try to hack ieee80211 layer to fix suspend/resume problem?

Thanks!