From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 16 13:43:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6FEB60A; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 13:43:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73299A2F; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 13:43:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Xq06X-000D3H-VG; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 14:43:01 +0100 Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 14:43:01 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Mathieu Arnold Subject: Re: after 10.0 -> 10.1 rebuild: how to force pkg reinstall ? Message-ID: <20141116134301.GE44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <20141116082544.GB44537@home.opsec.eu> <54686EB0.2070006@madpilot.net> <20141116095048.GC44537@home.opsec.eu> <76AAF7509195EF9C0B84B0E2@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20141116133656.GD44537@home.opsec.eu> <33E6DD4D6C672EDD59CCFA4C@atuin.in.mat.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <33E6DD4D6C672EDD59CCFA4C@atuin.in.mat.cc> Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 13:43:02 -0000 Hi! > | Thanks for the hint. I'll compare them at the next opportunity. > Well, you don't need to compare them, we build packages for branches on the > oldest supported release, so 8.4 built on 8.4, the packages for 9.1, 9.2 > and 9.3 built on 9.1, and the packages for 10.0 and 10.1 built on 10.0 :-) I build on 10.1 for repo.opsec.eu. And that's why I wanted to force the upgrade. I *guess* if I build a package in a 10.0 poudriere and in a 10.1 poudriere, they differ ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 6 years to go !