From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 13:29:04 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F91C990 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:29:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x233.google.com (mail-we0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E95201837 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:29:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f179.google.com with SMTP id w62so5188853wes.38 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:29:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/EYFyc9ZpyU8FZO5i/VoOYYAROpUJLr00/R+TzhNhsM=; b=xw9h+ETF2Svgx6FT49YoqZOQX0oNTFl7c34E6wJqHhJlJsOFy7xIW4yES1BLNWG81N VsM7ZsNbYtiuJ/14FaGAXKf6dydBKJ8c65mJpdYCWPQwSiVWoXLPAqM5vsQef5rhj2QJ W6JxJQ7R9YJZyTAcc+8mWlepSFWJ8WrLmZtCrErbiSYGYJalzCE3TmFv0NVxO5goAZwV kH24cdOs1411Y2N/ssp0hVoIFevSA8oG1qlrEPn3KLW/medhF1SvHFeVeBPNnsarnlH4 MVB38gTTdqW7MCtSlT5jCHs4g0N46Es0AZAgSapWRi+yV3++WDTsmzVby0BhEIP5uSFh DlAA== X-Received: by 10.180.77.200 with SMTP id u8mr3251164wiw.48.1390829342416; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:29:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-112-13.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.112.13]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ea4sm29072936wib.7.2014.01.27.05.29.01 for (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:29:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:29:00 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why was nslookup removed from FreeBSD 10? Message-ID: <20140127132900.1db7bca9@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <52E6562A.2050402@fjl.co.uk> References: <201401261420.s0QEKKMn080851@fire.js.berklix.net> <52E5DF02.4010500@bluerosetech.com> <52E6562A.2050402@fjl.co.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:29:04 -0000 On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:50:50 +0000 Frank Leonhardt wrote: > Sendmail could be considered a bit dated too. Will that be next? There has been some talk about replacing it with something more lightweight that would handle local mail (and possibly remote submission). > If > so, with "... | mail root" still work? yes