From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Jul 14 10:33:47 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA07198 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 10:33:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from peloton.physics.montana.edu (peloton.physics.montana.edu [153.90.192.177]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA07192; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 10:33:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@peloton.physics.montana.edu) Received: from localhost (brett@localhost) by peloton.physics.montana.edu (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA03932; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 11:33:20 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from brett@peloton.physics.montana.edu) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 11:33:20 -0600 (MDT) From: Brett Taylor To: Matthew Hunt cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/7273 In-Reply-To: <199807140244.TAA28647@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, > State-Changed-Why: > Patch applied, thanks. Should afterstep144 disappear, or does it > serve a purpose? I missed the resolution of that issue. I'm not sure. It IS fairly stable at this branch, but I feel it can probably go away as I'm not very excited about bumping up to the supposedly "stable" 1.5pre* releases as they still are a mess IMO. Brett *********************************************************** Brett Taylor brett@peloton.physics.montana.edu http://peloton.physics.montana.edu/brett/ How many Microsoft employees does it take to change a light bulb? Zero. They declared Darkness[tm] the standard. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message