Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2000 11:59:22 -0500 From: Jamil Taylor <jamil_taylor@pobox.com> To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.2-RC1 not (easily) bootable Message-ID: <3A1806EA.6E56BBDD@pobox.com> References: <3A17CDC1.7BFCA39B@eboa.com> <20001119083822.A39683@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David O'Brien wrote: > Why did you choose a "dangerously dedicated" install? "dangerously > dedicated" might go away in the future (as it doesn't leave space enough > space for boot0). Unless the normal slice configuration won't work for > you, there really is no good reason to use "dangerously dedicated". What if you have multiple drives in your system? Wouldn't "dangerously dedicated" yield more disk space for use? I have three drives in my system, and my third drive is "dangerously dedicated" to FreeBSD. No other operating systems use that drive, so I saw no reason not to make it dangerously dedicated. Jamil To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A1806EA.6E56BBDD>