From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jul 10 07:21:05 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id HAA13998 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 10 Jul 1996 07:21:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA13992 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 1996 07:21:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by root.com (8.7.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id HAA03974; Wed, 10 Jul 1996 07:20:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199607101420.HAA03974@root.com> X-Authentication-Warning: implode.root.com: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: David Dawes cc: SimsS@Infi.Net (Steve Sims), hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Some recent changes to GENERIC In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 10 Jul 1996 23:54:49 +1000." <199607101354.XAA09988@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au> From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@root.com Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 07:20:52 -0700 Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >>(For my benefit, can anyone explain why the default port address for ed0 >>is 0x280? I assume some historical reason, but I really don't know the >>details....) > >It is a common default for WD/SMC cards, which also use the ed driver. So is 0x300. There's even a hard jumper to select it, and I think the WD/SMC cards are even set to 0x300 out of the box. >>OK, how 'bout this: I'll endorse nuking the ed1 device, but only if the >>default settings for the ed0 device are changed to 5/300 in GENERIC. What >>say? > >No! Erm, why? 0x300 is a better default. -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project