Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 15:36:39 -0800 (PST) From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi Asami) To: danj@3skel.com Cc: gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ufs is too slow? Message-ID: <199611122336.PAA14170@vader.cs.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <199611122320.SAA25982@fnur.3skel.com> (message from Dan Janowski on Tue, 12 Nov 1996 18:20:09 -0500 (EST))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Justin T. Gibbs writes: * > * > The main reason MS is looking to Veritas is that NTFS just doesn't perform * > when striped or mirrored. The NOW project at Cal did I/O comparison studies * > on x86 platforms using Solaris, FreeBSD, Linux and NT and found that while * > FreeBSD and Solaris could achieve upwards of 30MB/s through a striped file * > system, NT topped out at around 9MB/s. This was NT3.51 - they may have * > improved things for 4.0. Uh, are you talking about us? ;) Yes, we did, but Solaris didn't perform nearly that well. It was more like 13MB/s. You are right about FreeBSD and Windows NT. * where did the Linux ext2fs fall? It didn't install on our PC with 2940UW. :( (We spent 2 weeks trying to install that crap, ugh.) Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611122336.PAA14170>