Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 19 Nov 2000 00:52:20 +0200
From:      Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>
To:        Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc:        arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: "Monotonic" counter/register call - commit candidate. 
Message-ID:  <200011182252.eAIMqPJ13415@gratis.grondar.za>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011190932340.767-100000@besplex.bde.org> ; from Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>  "Sun, 19 Nov 2000 09:47:55 %2B1100."
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011190932340.767-100000@besplex.bde.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > That function is kinda bloated; all I need is rdtsc() and its equivalents.
> 
> I'm not sure about that.  There are many interesting machine-dependent
> counters.  E.g., the counter for the number of instructions executed
> increases at a similar rate to the TSC but is more random.

I'm not looking for random. I'm looking for a fast counter.

M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200011182252.eAIMqPJ13415>