From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 21 10:02:42 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F4737B401 for ; Sat, 21 Jun 2003 10:02:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mta06-svc.ntlworld.com (mta06-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1EA43FA3 for ; Sat, 21 Jun 2003 10:02:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk) Received: from piii600.wadham.ox.ac.uk ([81.103.196.4]) by mta06-svc.ntlworld.comESMTP <20030621170239.WKRW16215.mta06-svc.ntlworld.com@piii600.wadham.ox.ac.uk>; Sat, 21 Jun 2003 18:02:39 +0100 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.1.20030621175853.02c92e00@popserver.sfu.ca> X-Sender: cperciva@popserver.sfu.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 18:02:38 +0100 To: ultraviolet@epweb.co.za, chat@freebsd.org From: Colin Percival In-Reply-To: <20030621163835.GA18653@tulip.epweb.co.za> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: Cryptographically enabled ports tree. X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 17:02:42 -0000 At 18:38 21/06/2003 +0200, William Fletcher wrote: >What I'm wondering about, is when FreeBSD is going to get >get a cryptographically signed ports tree system setup. > >It isn't a must, I was just wondering other peoples opinions about this. I've been thinking about this for a while; unfortunately I have neither the time to implement this right now, nor enough familiarity with CVS to make it work automagically. If nothing happens before September, I'll probably corner some people at BSDCon to talk about this. Colin Percival