From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 12 01:55:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF77106566B for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 01:55:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell0.rawbw.com (shell0.rawbw.com [198.144.192.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF9E8FC12 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 01:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eagle.yuri.org (stunnel@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell0.rawbw.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBC1sp8G056317 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:54:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Message-ID: <4D042B98.60907@rawbw.com> Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:55:36 -0800 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101211 Thunderbird/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Ports: How do dependent ports upgrade when dependency shared lib version is bumped? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 01:55:37 -0000 I recently updates the system. libatkmm-1.6.so.1 got bumped to libatkmm-1.6.so.2, now inkscape fails: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libatkmm-1.6.so.1" not found, required by "inkscape" What is the right behavior in such situation? Should all depending packages be also automatically bumped? Or portupghrade should detect the change and automatically upgrade dependent ports? Yuri