From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 30 17:20:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD8316A41F for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 17:20:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD3C143D45 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 17:20:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9UHKMET058691 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 17:20:22 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j9UHKMl6058690; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 17:20:22 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 17:20:22 GMT Message-Id: <200510301720.j9UHKMl6058690@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Brooks Davis Cc: Subject: Re: bin/88119: [patch] partial matching for ifconfig X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Brooks Davis List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 17:20:23 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/88119; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Brooks Davis To: bw@desync.com Cc: Brooks Davis , freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/88119: [patch] partial matching for ifconfig Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 09:18:22 -0800 On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 07:26:58PM -0400, bw@desync.com wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 03:32:02PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote: > > Thinking about it more I find this to be a significant POLA violation. > > It means you can no longer reliably test for interface existence with: > > > > if ifconfig $ifn > /dev/null 2>&1; then > > ... > > True, fixed. I dislike this 'fix'. If the partial matching is going to be generally useful, ifconfig needs to have a valid return status when it's run. I'm unwilling to commit this feature without it being activated by a flag. -- Brooks