From owner-freebsd-bugs  Tue Jun 22  5:26: 8 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 13E7814C85; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 05:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sheldonh@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from sheldonh@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id FAA39561;
	Tue, 22 Jun 1999 05:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sheldonh@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 05:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: <sheldonh@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <199906221225.FAA39561@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: gene@cif.rochester.edu, sheldonh@FreeBSD.org,
	freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, jdp@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: conf/10115: /etc/login.conf still implies LOGIN_CAP_AUTH
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Synopsis: /etc/login.conf still implies LOGIN_CAP_AUTH

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: sheldonh
State-Changed-When: Tue Jun 22 05:22:19 PDT 1999
State-Changed-Why: 
It sounds like you have enough of a handle on the situation to come up
with the required diffs. Wanna take a crack at it?


Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->jdp
Responsible-Changed-By: sheldonh
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Jun 22 05:22:19 PDT 1999
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
John brought PAM in, so he'll probably be interested in feedback.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message