From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Aug 24 16: 0:21 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from dfw-ix16.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix16.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.16])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078DD14F1F
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 15:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from asami@stampede.cs.berkeley.edu)
Received: (from smap@localhost)
          by dfw-ix16.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4)
	  id RAA05514; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 17:57:30 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from sji-ca5-176.ix.netcom.com(209.109.234.176) by dfw-ix16.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3)
	id rma005498; Tue Aug 24 17:57:16 1999
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) id PAA14784; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 15:57:07 -0700 (PDT)
To: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
Cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Should USE_IMAKE get ${MAKE_ENV}?
References: <199908241809.LAA09622@windsor.research.att.com>
From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami)
Date: 24 Aug 1999 15:57:06 -0700
In-Reply-To: Bill Fenner's message of "Tue, 24 Aug 1999 11:09:43 -0700"
Message-ID: <vqchflozt19.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
Lines: 15
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.4
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

 * From: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>

 *  .if defined(USE_IMAKE)
 * -	@(cd ${WRKSRC} && ${XMKMF})
 * +	@(cd ${WRKSRC} && ${SETENV} ${MAKE_ENV} ${XMKMF})
 *  .endif

Hmm.  I'm not sure if that's the right thing -- the imake step falls
under the "configure" meta-target, so maybe it should be
${CONFIGURE_ENV} that's passed (and the appropriate definitions of
PREFIX etc. added to that variable).

What do other people think?

-PW


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message