From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 19 10:51:28 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09CF516A4BF for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 10:51:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vmx1.skoleetaten.oslo.no (vmx1.skoleetaten.oslo.no [193.156.192.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D77F43F85 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 10:51:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from shamz@nevada.skoleetaten.oslo.no) Received: from smtp.skoleetaten.oslo.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) EBB547D593 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 19:44:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from nevada.skoleetaten.oslo.no (nevada.skoleetaten.oslo.no [193.156.192.131])C55D27D3A5 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 19:44:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from nevada.skoleetaten.oslo.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h7JHi8Gq084304 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 19:44:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from shamz@nevada.skoleetaten.oslo.no) Received: (from shamz@localhost)h7JHhxOc084303 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 19:43:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 19:43:58 +0200 From: Shaun Jurrens To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030819174358.GN71232@nevada.skoleetaten.oslo.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oN4OvwWIcd1E23D1" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE Subject: ng_fec and vlans X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 17:51:28 -0000 --oN4OvwWIcd1E23D1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Good day all, In my infinite striving towards perfection *cough* I've gone through a lot = of hoops to get ng_fec working for (at least for the time being) the bge=20 interfaces (not that I understand it really yet). Now, being limited in=20 the number of interfaces available to me on this project, I'm attempting=20 to attach vlans to the fec interface, with no signs of success, up to=20 this point. I have two dell 1750's connected to a c3750 switch. FEC works with ip addresses attached to the fec0 interfaces (although, single connections seem to remain on one link or the other, I haven't played with the load-balancing on the switch yet for the channel group, might be my fault). =20 My questions are: 1) Is is even possible to successfully "attach" vlan devices to netgraph nodes, specifically the ng_fec node (I can't decipher enough of netgraph to begin with to make a guess, just a copy monkey here...), i.e. have interface fec the parent device? 2) Is the correct way on the Cisco side to configure interfaces in the FEC= =20 group as trunks, _or_ group them as access ports, and make the FEC group a= =20 trunk? (I haven't read exhaustively on this, seems to be some descrepency between CatOS and IOS on this anyway...) btw, with a few more hints, I could get a manpage up... I have patches to= =20 attach it to the world build as well, compiles fine on 4.8-R, fwiw. --=20 Med vennlig hilsen/Sincerely, Shaun D. Jurrens Drift og Sikkerhetskonsulent IKT-Avdeling Oslo Skoleetaten gpg key fingerprint: 007A B6BD 8B1B BAB9 C583 2D19 3A7F 4A3E F83E 84AE --oN4OvwWIcd1E23D1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/QmHeOn9KPvg+hK4RAojcAJ4vyH79Jw8zfKtL2nLHPinXUIVxPwCeLW5w kthIovob5I8C+LTA2yOIgFI= =oozF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oN4OvwWIcd1E23D1--