From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May  7 00:50:11 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F65116A4CE
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri,  7 May 2004 00:50:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cell.sick.ru (cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CFC843D53
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri,  7 May 2004 00:50:10 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from glebius@cell.sick.ru)
Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cell.sick.ru (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i477moQE095188
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Fri, 7 May 2004 11:48:50 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from glebius@cell.sick.ru)
Received: (from glebius@localhost)
	by cell.sick.ru (8.12.9/8.12.6/Submit) id i477mnul095187;
	Fri, 7 May 2004 11:48:49 +0400 (MSD)
Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 11:48:49 +0400
From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@cell.sick.ru>
To: Andrew Riabtsev <resident@b-o.ru>
Message-ID: <20040507074849.GA95043@cell.sick.ru>
Mail-Followup-To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@cell.sick.ru>,
	Andrew Riabtsev <resident@b-o.ru>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
References: <20040506144616.GA43633@FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw>
	<832830880.20040507113906@b-o.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <832830880.20040507113906@b-o.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Problem with ng_ether packet flow..
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 07:50:11 -0000

On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 11:39:06AM +0400, Andrew Riabtsev wrote:
A> JWW> Why the [ng_ether_rcvdata] won't check if packets should travel to 
A> JWW> the [bdg_forward] when they are bridged packets?
A> 
A> This is how it should work, you get entrance to low level network
A> (lower hook) and upper level (upper). To bridge or not to bridge
A> figuring out with ng_bridge or other ng_* modules is up to you to
A> decide. 

  Jian-Wei says a reasonable thing. If he described situation right way,
then it means that using ng_tee on top of ng_ether is incompatible
with bridge(4).

  Someone should look into it.

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.
GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE