Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 7 Apr 2010 18:31:08 +0400
From:      Arseny Nasokin <eirnym@gmail.com>
To:        Eir Nym <eirnym@gmail.com>
Cc:        "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: BIND from system and from ports
Message-ID:  <BB9C9C40-30D0-4DBE-B4B0-A96A9BF4B1D1@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <l2sac29a5e51004070247j8906bc4oc55ebda6e18e634a@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <l2sac29a5e51004070247j8906bc4oc55ebda6e18e634a@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On 7 Apr 2010, at 13:47, Eir Nym <eirnym@gmail.com> wrote:

> All is good in BIND in system, except it depends on ports tree with
> various options.

WITH_BIND_XML and WITH_BIND_IDN

> I have to do followed algorithm, to enable these options:
> 1) make and install base system
> 2) install needed dependencies from ports tree
> 3) rebuild and reinstall world
>
> This is more complex than:
> 1) make and install base system
> 2) install same(?) BIND from ports tree with same options
>
> Why does base system has any dependencies from ports?
> I know about application features, but special cases aren't special
> enough to break the rules, isn't it?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BB9C9C40-30D0-4DBE-B4B0-A96A9BF4B1D1>