From owner-cvs-all Mon Dec 11 3:40:32 2000 From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 03:40:28 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6C2737B402; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 03:40:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mobile.wemm.org (adsl-64-163-195-99.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [64.163.195.99]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A30EF6E2F97; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 01:36:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mobile.wemm.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eBB9WXK25578; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 01:32:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Message-Id: <200012110932.eBB9WXK25578@mobile.wemm.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: Marcel Moolenaar , obrien@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: linprocfs placement... In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 01:32:33 -0800 From: Peter Wemm Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Marcel Moolenaar writes: > > Where linprocfs should be moved to is not exactly clear. It started off > > in sys/miscfs and moved to sys/i386/linux. Moving it again to, say, > > sys/i386 might not make everybody happy. > > No, because it would need to move again once it's no longer MD. If it > has to move, move it to sys/compat. Actually, sys/fs/ would be better.. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message