From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 27 13:43:06 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B7F3D2
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:43:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEECC197E
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:43:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.35]
 (host86-163-127-175.range86-163.btcentralplus.com [86.163.127.175])
 (authenticated bits=0)
 by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0RDh3pi079518
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:43:03 GMT
 (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk)
Message-ID: <52E6626A.3080606@fjl.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:43:06 +0000
From: Frank Leonhardt <frank2@fjl.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why was nslookup removed from FreeBSD 10?
References: <201401261420.s0QEKKMn080851@fire.js.berklix.net>
 <52E5DF02.4010500@bluerosetech.com> <52E6562A.2050402@fjl.co.uk>
 <20140127132900.1db7bca9@gumby.homeunix.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140127132900.1db7bca9@gumby.homeunix.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:43:06 -0000

On 27/01/2014 13:29, RW wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:50:50 +0000
> Frank Leonhardt wrote:
>
>
>> Sendmail could be considered a bit dated too. Will that be next?
> There has been some talk about replacing it with something more
> lightweight that would handle local mail (and possibly remote
> submission).
>
>
>>   If
>> so, with "... | mail root" still work?
> yes
>
I don't imagine anyone planned to break scripts when BIND was replaced 
either ;-) The law of unintended consequences applies.

Regards, Frank.