From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 3 04:44:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E623106564A for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 04:44:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lsc@luke.xen.prgmr.com) Received: from luke.xen.prgmr.com (luke.xen.prgmr.com [38.99.2.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D688FC08 for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 04:44:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by luke.xen.prgmr.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 07DFF1043D8; Thu, 3 May 2012 00:44:24 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 00:44:24 -0400 From: "Luke S. Crawford" To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120503044424.GG8940@luke.xen.prgmr.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10 prognostication... X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 04:44:25 -0000 On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 12:31:12AM -0400, Vance Siemens wrote: > Can't say that I wouldn't look forward to this, but it sounds a little off: > > http://www.trollaxor.com/2012/05/freebsd-x-berkeley-unix-apple-quality.html > > What do others think? Please leave trollaxor on Kuro5hin or slashdot where he belongs. I mean, this isn't even adequacy level stuff.