From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Feb 7 17:57:21 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id RAA15509 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 7 Feb 1995 17:57:21 -0800 Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA15503 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 1995 17:57:19 -0800 Received: (from phk@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id RAA14880; Tue, 7 Feb 1995 17:57:11 -0800 From: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-Id: <199502080157.RAA14880@ref.tfs.com> Subject: Re: sup: Ok, I'm gonna do it. To: sysseh@devetir.qld.gov.au (Stephen Hocking) Date: Tue, 7 Feb 1995 17:57:11 -0800 (PST) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199502080152.BAA23286@netfl15a.devetir.qld.gov.au> from "Stephen Hocking" at Feb 8, 95 01:52:29 am Content-Type: text Content-Length: 576 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Will the new installation stuff use something like the dialog > library hacked to run under X - I can't see why we are not able to run up > something that will work under curses & X automagically. Maybe the dialog > stuff is a good spot to start, unless someone has already done something > cool for tcl/tk. You see, this really sums it up for me: Nice ideas. But have you heard anybody say they were making a dialog for X ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp TRW Financial Systems, Inc. FreeBSD has, until now, not one single time had an undetected error. :-)